On Mon, Feb 18, 2013, 6:05 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
Desiree:
May you please let Gabriel know that I've sent him a few emails.
Also, I want to make sure that we're very, very clear on something: my
communication with Gabriel, via email, is considered the same as
communication via telephone. In other words, you absolutely MAY NOT
monitor my emails with Gabriel or read them without my consent. I assume
that all of my emails with Gabriel are confidential and that assumption
provides the reasonable expectation of privacy under the law. Even if
Gabriel says you may read them you still require my consent (God bless
California's privacy laws). And I absolutely DO NOT consent! Also,
Gabriel's email account was setup by me and I am the responsible party on
it so he is not required to provide you the password or access to it. I
have informed him of this and if I find out that you have attempted to get
him to give you the password or to read his email I absolutely will bring
it up to the court.
Thank you,
Fox
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013, 9:16 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
Dude seriously - I haven't read the letters, I don't monitor phone calls,
and I don't read his email - so knock it off. I read 1 letter and I
already told him. He's got every letter from you unopened. So chill.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013, 1:41 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
I don't believe I accused you of anything in my email. So what is it you
would like me to "knock off"? I only stated things as clearly as possible
so there is no misunderstanding or room for anyone to say they didn't know.
Fox
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013, 1:57 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
You are wasting your time and mine by "clarifying" things that are
irrelevant. Please don't waste my time if you have nothing of value to say.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013, 2:17 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013, 4:40 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
May you please stop assuming that everything I say to you is intended to be
confrontational? Had I not included the extensive disclaimer then you
would be able to claim ignorance if I complained to the court. The
disclaimer ensures that cannot happen. That's all.
Based on your protestation in court that your voice mail was working the
whole time I was in custody and that you, Sage and Gabriel have been
receiving messages from others during that time, and that you have not
withheld any letters from Gabriel I intend to be VERY specific and VERY
proactive in my wording.
I was able to obtain a CD from the Santa Ana Jail (thanks to my copious
grievances) with the recordings of every call I made to your home number
before my release. The judge told you to "be very careful about what you
say because you're under oath", yet you still insisted that your voice mail
was working fine. Don't be ridiculous, Desiree! How can I possibly have
ANY trust in you?
Anyway, I'm not being adversarial. I'm making sure that everything is very
clear and direct. Would you prefer I be vague?
Fox
