Fwd: Your Amazon.com order of "Grand Theft Auto V" has shipped!
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 5:20 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
From:
To:
Date:
Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 5:20 PM
Subject:
Fwd: Your Amazon.com order of "Grand Theft Auto V" has shipped!
Gabriel, Desiree:
According to Amazon and the carrier, OnTrac, the package was delivered and signed for at 12:49pm today. Also, according to USPS the other envelope Liz sent last week was also received earlier this week.
Desiree: If these items have arrived (as Amazon and USPS confirm they have) I insist you provide them to Gabriel immediately as interfering with my mail to him not only violates the court's instructions to you, but it's also a federal offense.
Thanks,
Fox
Fox
Attachments:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 5:40 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
From:
To:
Date:
Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 5:40 PM
Subject:
Re: Your Amazon.com order of "Grand Theft Auto V" has shipped!
Fox, Gabriel has been checking the mail all week long - I haven't checked it once. Please stop accusing me of interfering with your mail communication with him. I will check with the office tomorrow to see if they have the packages you are referring to.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 5:44 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
From:
To:
Date:
Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 5:44 PM
Subject:
Re: Your Amazon.com order of "Grand Theft Auto V" has shipped!
I would only accuse you of something if I had irrefutable proof. I believe that, in this case, I have irrefutable proof that the package was delivered, and signed for, yet Gabriel has not received it. Therefore, somebody at your address has received at least one of the packages and NOT provided it to Gabriel. Moreover, I have not accused you of anything. Please read the email again and you will see that. You DO speak English, right? Fox
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 5:46 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
From:
To:
Date:
Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 5:46 PM
Subject:
Re: Your Amazon.com order of "Grand Theft Auto V" has shipped!
No Sir - you check your facts before you infer that I have interfered at all!
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 5:48 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
From:
To:
CC:
Date:
Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 5:48 PM
Subject:
Re: Your Amazon.com order of "Grand Theft Auto V" has shipped!
I just went the front office and there are NO packages for my apartment number.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 5:49 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
From:
To:
Date:
Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 5:49 PM
Subject:
Re: Your Amazon.com order of "Grand Theft Auto V" has shipped!
Are you suggesting that Amazon's information is false?
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 5:51 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
From:
To:
Date:
Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 5:51 PM
Subject:
Re: Your Amazon.com order of "Grand Theft Auto V" has shipped!
"Desiree: If these items have arrived (as Amazon and USPS confirm they have) I insist you provide them to Gabriel immediately as interfering with my mail to him not only violates the court's instructions to you, but it's also a federal offense."
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 5:52 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
From:
To:
Date:
Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 5:52 PM
Subject:
Re: Your Amazon.com order of "Grand Theft Auto V" has shipped!
I'm not suggesting a goddamn thing - I'm telling you I have no packages.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 5:54 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
From:
To:
Date:
Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 5:54 PM
Subject:
Re: Your Amazon.com order of "Grand Theft Auto V" has shipped!
He has received every useless package of candy bars, potato chips and shirts that are too big. As soon as it arrives he will receive whatever you have sent him this time too.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 8:18 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
From:
To:
Date:
Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 8:18 PM
Subject:
Re: Your Amazon.com order of "Grand Theft Auto V" has shipped!
Desiree: And if I were not up here in Canada, I would not be able to send him those wonderfully delicious candy bars, and he would not be able to eat those wonderfully delicious candy bars. So, again, I thank you for bringing about this current circumstance and providing me the opportunity to be able to provide Gabriel with wonderfully delicious candy bars that he has enjoyed so much. As for the T-Shirts, they only come in adult sizes. I am aware they are too big. You seem to have missed the point (not surprisingly). It's what's on the shirts that is the novelty. Not the shirt itself. You're not very quick, are you? And, we can't really consider those other packages "useless". As long as Gabriel enjoyed them, and as long as it helps to reinforce, in his mind, that I'm thinking about him and that I'm concerned for his happiness, even though I'm not there, then they have served their purpose. In that respect, they are anything but useless. They are quite effective. And tasty. Wow! You are wrong SOOOO often. It must really hard to be you. Good evening, Fox
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 5:55 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
From:
To:
Date:
Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 5:55 PM
Subject:
Re: Your Amazon.com order of "Grand Theft Auto V" has shipped!
Jesus Christ, woman! Do you not see the word "If" at the beginning of the statement? Do you know what effect that has on the rest of the statement? It makes it conditional! There is no accusation in my statement, unless that condition is true.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 5:57 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
From:
To:
Date:
Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 5:57 PM
Subject:
Re: Your Amazon.com order of "Grand Theft Auto V" has shipped!
then why say it at all!!
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 6:07 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
From:
To:
Date:
Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 6:07 PM
Subject:
Re: Your Amazon.com order of "Grand Theft Auto V" has shipped!
Okay, let me say this as simply as possible, since you seem to be more obtuse (or just belligerent) than I could have imagined: the package was delivered to your address today. Someone using the initials FD signed for it. It is there, period. I will not accuse you of something without proof, but I will gladly state my belief - and my belief is: you are withholding the package that was delivered from Amazon today and you are withholding the envelope Liz sent, on my behalf, last week. You are jealous that I am able to provide things for Gabriel that you cannot and, perhaps out of spite, you are refusing to give them to him because they will make him happy and it pisses you off that I am able to make him happy from 1500 miles away and you are not! That is my belief. I do not state it as a fact - only a belief. But, I'm usually right about these things. Now go get pissed off and tell everyone how much of an asshole I am and how I treat you so bad. Fox
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 6:17 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
From:
To:
Date:
Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 6:17 PM
Subject:
Re: Your Amazon.com order of "Grand Theft Auto V" has shipped!
Believe what you want, plain and simple - you are wrong. Sorry to burst your bubble.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 6:31 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
From:
To:
Date:
Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 6:31 PM
Subject:
Re: Your Amazon.com order of "Grand Theft Auto V" has shipped!
And once again, I have proof and evidence to support my claims (confirmation of delivery on Amazon's site, of which I sent you a copy). And what evidence do you offer in support of your claims? As always...nothing. But never fear, I have sent Gabriel a copy of the delivery confirmation. He knows it was delivered today. He knows I kept my promise. And he knows that there is only one logic explanation for why he did not receive it: because you don't want me to get it for him. I'm guessing you were going to get it for him for his birthday and you're pissed off that I got it for him first. If that's the case you should have let me know. But you didn't, therefore, I've done no wrong. And either way, Gabriel knows the only reason he is not playing the game this very minute is because of you. Cheers, and great parenting, Fox
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 5:48 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
From:
To:
Date:
Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 5:48 PM
Subject:
Re: Your Amazon.com order of "Grand Theft Auto V" has shipped!
If anything, I have made an implication...YOU have made an inference. The speaker implies; the listener infers. Apparently you DON'T speak English! What facts are you referring to?