Fwd: Gabriel's Passport
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013, 4:23 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
Contrary to your incorrect and unfounded belief, here is the email I received from my attorney on November 27, 2013, letting me know he obtained the certified ordered and forwarded it to the State Department. So, since you already agreed to pay the legal fees if my attorney took care of this for you, I will provide you a bill for the two hours he spent on it. If you don't pay me back for it then I will take you to small claims court and request the family court also order you to reimburse me - since you said you would and since it is because of your own screw up that I had to pay the extra money for this. Fox ---------- Forwarded message ----------On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Horacio Lozano wrote:Hi Fox I was able to obtain a certified copy of order and mailed it express mail to avoid further delay the tracking no em997248693 us www.usps.com the package should arrive by 3pm Friday have a nice weekend Desiree does not know the document was mailed she believes I will be going to court on Monday to request a certified copy Sent from my iPhone
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013, 4:26 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
That was done before I ever made the offer. Null and void - not paying.
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013, 4:37 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
That's not relevant, from a legal perspective.
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013, 4:42 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
So you're saying that you're lawyer sent a copy of the document on Wednesday of that week. That you knew this document was sent on Wednesday of last week.
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013, 4:44 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
I knew, the moment I received the email from him. The email is dated November 27, 2013 at 3:17PM PST, so knew on November 27, 2013 at approximately 3:25PM PST.
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013, 4:54 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
Are you are agreeing that November 27th, 2013 was last Wednesday and that you knew the document was sent at that time?
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013, 4:55 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
Yes.
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013, 4:56 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
Not the Wednesday that just past, the one before that. I knew and I chose not to tell you. I'd rather let you stress or play your games so that I could collect more to use against you down the road. It's how I roll. I tell you very little about what I know.
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013, 5:00 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
And I'm an open book, so I don't care what you think you know.
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013, 6:19 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
If you're an open book why do you keep refusing my requests to prove information that would be incriminating against you?
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013, 6:31 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
Let me also point out, before you try to claim that I had been lying about helping you with getting the certified copy of the order and about refusing to let my attorney go to the court for you - nothing I said in this matter, over the past week and a half was a lie. Again, you see the power of "literal truth"! My statements were all framed in the present and future tense - not the past. And your questions were also in the future tense. By the time you asked if I would help you, and by the time I answered, my attorney had already gone to the court, obtained and mailed the certified copy. You never asked if I "had" (past tense), you only asked if I "would" (future tense). So, taken literally, my statements in the matter were all true. And that is why you will never beat me - I'm just smarter than you. The other reason is because you lash out, immediately, out of anger and emotion; whereas I remain calm, let things settle, perhaps for years, then when the adversary has moved on with their life and put the dispute behind them, and they think everything is fine - THEN I reciprocate.