Request for confirmation of understanding
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015, 2:38 PM, Patrick Fox wrote:
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, Mar 16, 2015, 2:38 PM
Subject:
Request for confirmation of understanding
Hello, Desiree. Let me confirm that I am understanding your thought process and reasoning correctly. So, is it your belief: - that my real and legal name is Richard Riess; - that I assumed the name Patrick Fox and the identity of same; - that I either obtained a full set of government issued identification in the name Patrick Fox fraudulently, or I forged a full set of identification in the name Patrick Fox; - that, even though there is no record of a person named Patrick Fox, born November 24, 1973 in Canada until a year and a half ago, I have been able, with that name and identity, to pass the stringent background check and obtain a PAL, not only for rifles, but also for handguns, AND to obtain an Authorization to Transport (which permits me to carry those handguns out in public); - that with an assumed identity I have been able to incorporate a business in the province of BC; - that the identity I've assumed is a US citizen (not a Canadian citizen) and am, therefore, living in Canada under the assumed identity of an illegal alien? Is that accurate so far? And so, you believe that I did all this, and I tricked both the US and the Canadian governments into believing I'm this whole other person - such that they issued me a driver's license; firearms lisence; they allow me to cross into and out of the two countries without hassle; in this day and age with electronic fingerprint scanners connected, globally, to huge databases, where a person's identity can be verified in a matter of seconds? Yet you claim to refuse to believe that I could have assumed the name and identity of Richard Riess before you and I met? Back when there was no Internet and no electronic fingerprint scanners and facial regocgnition systems and GPS? Back when obtaining a birth certificate was just a matter of filling out the application and paying the fee? Really? That's your position? I refuse to believe a person (you) can be that obtuse. Can you not see how ridiculous that makes you look? In typical fashion, I don't expect you to reply to this because I don't imagine there is any sensible response that you can make other than admitting that you're either an idiot, or that your don't really believe a word of what you say and you're just too humiliated about being wrong so frequently and about being such a retard that you actually married and had a child with someone who you didn't even know their name. Fox