Proof of service of declaration filed in the California proceedings

Incorrect.  I stated my name is not "Richard Riess" - I made no claim of 
not being the party "named" in any court hearing.  That was an inference 
on your part.  I did state I would not accept any mail addressed to 
"Richard Riess" because that is not my name and taking mail addressed to 
another person without that person's consent is illegal.  I made no 
reference to reading any such documents - only to accepting them.

Attempting to serve a party using a name other than their legal name 
does not meet the requirements of service of process under California or 
Arizona law.  For example, suppose you decided to change your name back 
to Tomlin (as any decent person would do after getting divorced), then 
if I tried to serve you under the name Capuano and you informed me of 
such, then the mail got returned to me because there is no one at your 
address with the name Capuano - then I would not have made a reasonable 
effort to attempt to serve you.  If the serving party is not aware of 
the other party's legal name then that's a different story - as long as 
they make every reasonable effort to effect service.  Since you know my 
legal name is Patrick Fox, then attempting to serve me as Richard Riess 
does not fulfil the requirement of "reasonable effort".

Please read some law books or consult someone who know what they're 
talking about.

Patrick